Florida Appeals Court Reinstates Felony Charges for Unregistered Bitcoin Sale


0

A United States appellate court in the state of Florida has reinstated charges against a man who sold Bitcoin (BTC) to an undercover police officer, local media Miami Herald reports on Jan. 30.

According to the report, the Third District Court of Appeal ruled that a judge who dismissed charges against the defendant, Michell Espinoza, was wrong. Espinoza is a website designer who was charged with allegedly transmitting and laundering $1,500 worth of BTC without a money transmitter license.

At the initial trial in a Miami-Dade circuit court, the defense argued that, since Bitcoin is not considered money under Florida law, no license is required. The judge subsequently ruled that Bitcoin is not money, and its sale unintentionally for illegal purposes does not constitute money laundering, further stating that BTC is just “poker chips that people are willing to buy from you.”

Still, the appellate court ruled that Espinoza indeed engaged in unlicensed money transmitting, as he neither registered with Florida’s Office of Financial Regulation nor complied with anti-money laundering regulation (AML). The court stated that his “bitcoins-for-cash business requires him to register as a payment instrument seller and money transmitter.”

The court also added that the defendant was not “merely selling his own personal bitcoins, he was marketing a business.” Felony charges against Espinoza have reportedly been reinstated, but no trial date has been set so far.

Charles Evans, a Barry University economics professor who served as a defense witness, reportedly disagrees with the decision. Still, he thinks the decision is part of a broader trend towards the regulation of cryptocurrencies, stating:

“The Wild West days are over. The regulators and prosecutors are trying to bring order to all the chaos — and this is part of the process.”

Last week, the state of Pennsylvania clarified that cryptocurrency exchanges are not subject to the Money Transmitter Act. A document from the Department of Banking and Securities states that crypto exchanges are not required to carry a license to offer their services to Pennsylvania residents.

Source : COINTELEGRAPH


Like it? Share with your friends!

0

What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
0
hate
confused confused
0
confused
fail fail
0
fail
fun fun
0
fun
geeky geeky
0
geeky
love love
0
love
lol lol
0
lol
omg omg
0
omg
win win
0
win
COINTELEGRAPH

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Choose A Format
Story
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
Video
Youtube, Vimeo or Vine Embeds
List
The Classic Internet Listicles
Open List
Submit your own item and vote up for the best submission
Countdown
The Classic Internet Countdowns
Poll
Voting to make decisions or determine opinions
Ranked List
Upvote or downvote to decide the best list item
Personality quiz
Series of questions that intends to reveal something about the personality
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Meme
Upload your own images to make custom memes
Audio
Soundcloud or Mixcloud Embeds
Image
Photo or GIF
Gif
GIF format